Featured Post

Top 7: That sinking feeling.

Not really a web-related post, but I’ve had a pretty bad day and need to unwind. I haven’t written a list like this in a long time, which is something I used to do quite often on my old blog, and quite enjoy. That said, here (in no particular order) are the top seven things that give me an...

Read More

Social media roadblocks.

Posted by Mikey McCorry | Posted in Elsewhere | Posted on 23-11-2009

0

Just read this over on ReadWriteWeb and found it particularly poignant.

“One of the reasons social media can be so challenging is that it often challenges hierarchies… and people at the top of those hierarchies have grown comfortable there.

“Some see the potential advantages of an engaging, open online presence, but others feel threatened and vulnerable. They have a wide range of hostile responses at their disposal: from the passive-aggressive to the outright belligerent.”

WDS09: jQuery – From Novice to Ninja

Posted by Mikey McCorry | Posted in Featured | Posted on 06-10-2009

Tags: , , , ,

0

with Earle Castledine

Apparently I’m now a jQuery ninja. Who knew?

My Day One Workshop for Web Directions South 09 was run by Earle Castledine (with a little help from Craig Sharkey) and aimed to teach me a bit about jQuery. I’ve been looking for the right excuse to make the switch from MooTools to jQuery for a while now. The MooTools community tries hard, and while I think that it is technically a better library, jQuery just wins hands down when it comes to real-world usage, available plugins and general community support and adoption. But this is not a jQuery vs MooTools post; there are enough of them out there already.

Earle did a great job of simplifying the concepts for the javascript noobs in the room without alienating the more advanced peeps who already have an understanding of jQuery and what it can do. True, it started off a bit slow, but before too long we were using jQuery to do most of the cool stuff that jQuery works best for: traversing the DOM and turning up the Ajax-o-meter. A few choice dairy-related phrases emerged from the session too, which can only be defined as “had to be there” moments, such as “it all made sense when I saw the cheese” and “they go together like cheese and… and stuff.”

I already have a few projects that are half-finished, requiring just a bit of progressive enhancement to make them a bit more awesome, so I’ll definitely be playing with jQuery a bit more this week to bed-down a few concepts. Thanks Earle.

Accessibility by subscription? No thanks.

Posted by Mikey McCorry | Posted in Featured | Posted on 14-06-2009

Tags: , , , , ,

6

Accessibility shouldn't cost a lot of money if your website is built with accessibility in mind from the beginning.

Accessibility shouldn't cost a lot of money if your website is built with accessibility in mind from the beginning.

I was recently asked to evaluate a product called BrowseAloud in the interest of improving a website’s accessibility. This is a browser plugin which aims to help those people who have difficulty seeing the screen, maybe through old age or those with lower literacy or dyslexia who might find it helpful to hear rather than read the words on the page. It basically functions as a screen reader, but will only operate within the browser on websites who have subscribed to the BrowseAloud service.

My first reaction was to point out that many users who require this sort of accommodation would usually already have software installed on their computer to help them. Most operating systems have Text-to-Speech and screen-reading (available in Windows since XP by pressing the Windows Key + U), screen region enlargement and visual contrast functionality built into them and most web browsers have text resizing/zoom functionality available.

In addition to these tools already available, we invest a great deal of time and effort ensuring that the websites we build meet all mandatory (and many optional) accessibility guidelines and regulations, and take a long-term view to ensure that accessibility for all is maintained.

Having said that, I can see how this sort of technology would be useful. The main problem I have with this particular product is that it is something that actively must be downloaded and installed by the user in order to be available. Many people with text access issues are particularly unlikely to be able/willing to download and install anything additional to their computers. A competitor to this product, Talklets, seems like a slightly better solution as it does not require anything special to be installed apart from the Flash Plugin (which is almost as ubiquitous as the web browser itself.)

I’m personally also not a fan of BrowseAloud’s business model. Their plugin requires no changes to be made to a website or software to be purchased or installed. Paying them an annual fee simply adds your website to a white-list of sites that their plugin will work with. There’s no reason why BrowseAloud couldn’t work with ALL websites, but they cripple the plugin until you pay them what could be an expensive annual cost. (Granted, I don’t know exactly how much it costs, but from what I’ve read from others, it’s not cheap.) I would probably prefer them to sell the un-crippled plugin to the public for a nominal fee, or at least offer that as an option. I guess it’s easier for them to target enterprise organisations such as government and educational sites, mainly because traditionally they are the types to throw lots of money at a perceived problem.

The Opera browser, available free of charge, also has in-built speech capability which can assist with reading web page content. There are also free extensions to Firefox such as FireVox which adds web-page reading to the browser. While I’m not sure how effective these tools are in the real world, I would much prefer to use an accessibility page of a website to point users to these resources that will help them with ALL websites.

In summary, there are a lot of options for accessibility these days. Accessibility should mostly be built in to the website by following W3C standards for development and accessibility. Additional tools can be used to ensure that as many people as possible can access the content of the site, but I believe these users should get themselves a solution that works on ALL sites, not just on some that have been “enabled”. Otherwise, all you’re doing is setting up a nice walled garden for them, and as soon as you need to link out to an external site or whatever, you’re leaving them stranded. “Give a man a fish…”, etcetera.

Top 7: That sinking feeling.

Posted by Mikey McCorry | Posted in Featured | Posted on 18-12-2008

Tags:

0

Not really a web-related post, but I’ve had a pretty bad day and need to unwind. I haven’t written a list like this in a long time, which is something I used to do quite often on my old blog, and quite enjoy. That said, here (in no particular order) are the top seven things that give me an uneasy feeling:

  • Drinking cold water from a coffee mug. It just doesn’t feel right…
  • When my hair gets to that length where its too long to spike up at the front and goes all wavy.
  • When completing a transaction at a store, and the shop assistant says “Have a nice day. Goodbye.” and I say “Goodbye.” but I’m still putting my money away and gathering my stuff, so I’m, like, still there about 10 seconds after having said goodbye, and the shop assistant is just standing there smiling at you.
  • The possibility that every wall mirror could actually be a one-way mirror with a secret room behind it, like in Law and Order.
  • When greeted with “Hello”, I respond with “Good thanks”.
  • The weird sludgy life form growing in my coffee cup when I return to work from a long weekend.
  • When making a split-second decision whether to say one word or another, and you end up inventing an entirely new word, then hope that the person you’re talking to doesn’t notice.

Astral Coolness

Posted by Mikey McCorry | Posted in Elsewhere | Posted on 03-12-2008

0

The other night I noticed two bright stars in the sky, the only ones visible at that stage, in close proximity to the moon. I thought it looked pretty cool and thought nothing else of it. Turns out, they were Venus and Jupiter! I’m still amazed to to think I could see a planet 540 million miles away with the naked eye.